Drug Database
SI

sirolimus (Excel / Excel II)

✓ Approved

JW Medical Systems · MTOR · 小分子

什么是 sirolimus?

sirolimus 是一种小分子,由JW Medical Systems研发。该药已获批,用于治疗相关适应症,给药途径:Surgical Implantation。

药物档案

商品名Excel, Excel II
公司JW Medical Systems
药物类别小分子
分子靶点MTOR
给药途径Surgical Implantation
状态Approved

作用机制

分子靶点

sirolimus 作用于 1 个分子靶点:

MTORmechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (FRAP2, RAPT1)
需要更深入的分析?Noah AI 可解释复杂机制并与同类药物比较。

治疗适应症

sirolimus 针对 1 个适应症,涉及 1 个治疗领域。

治疗领域疾病/病症分期
Injury, poisoning and procedural complicationsRestenosis✓ Approved

相关研究文献

PubMedBiomedicines2026-10-27

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Exploratory 12-Month Clinical Follow-Up of a Novel BIOtorcin™-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: The BRight PK Study.

Lee Bernardette Jingfei BJ, Daudu Davina D, Dwyer Isabel I, Mwipatayi Daniela Liezel DL et al.

Background/Objectives: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide local antiproliferative therapy during endovascular revascularization without leaving a permanent vascular scaffold. Sirolimus is an attractive cytostatic antiproliferative agent, although its relatively low lipophilicity creates challenges for rapid arterial uptake and sustained tissue residence following balloon delivery. The BRight DCB is a novel peripheral DCB coated with BIOtorcin™ (CRC-015), a highly lipophilic synthetic derivative of sirolimus. The BRight PK study primarily evaluated the systemic pharmacokinetics of BIOtorcin™ and its metabolite sirolimus following treatment of femoropopliteal disease and secondarily assessed procedural performance, safety, patency, and functional outcomes over 12 months. Methods: BRight PK was a prospective, single-center, non-randomized pharmacokinetic study involving six adults with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD; Rutherford-Becker category 2-4) caused by de novo superficial femoral and/or proximal popliteal artery disease. Following mandatory predilatation, lesions were treated with one or two BRight DCBs. Whole-blood BIOtorcin™ and sirolimus concentrations were measured before treatment and serially from 5 min to 24 h after removal of the final DCB. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Angiography and duplex ultrasound were independently assessed by a core laboratory, and endpoint-related clinical events were independently adjudicated. Results: All six participants completed 12-month follow-up. Mean age was 70.8 ± 7.4 years, and four (66.7%) were male. Seven BRight DCBs treated six lesions. Mean core-laboratory lesion length was 140.85 ± 136.23 mm, and baseline diameter stenosis was 78.50 ± 23.39%. Mean BIOtorcin™ exposure was 3976.8 ± 1665.7 µg (0.051 ± 0.0188 mg/kg). BIOtorcin™ Cmax was 23.60 ± 9.88 ng/mL at 5 min, terminal half-life was 21.87 ± 10.17 h, AUC0-t was 28.30 ± 12.19 h·ng/mL, and AUC0-∞ was 47.47 ± 18.27 h·ng/mL. Sirolimus Cmax was 0.692 ± 0.462 ng/mL at 24 h, when concentrations remained on the ascending portion of the concentration-time curve, indicating that the 24 h sampling window captured only early systemic sirolimus exposure rather than a complete pharmacokinetic profile. Device success was 100% (7/7); core-laboratory technical and procedural success were each 66.7% (4/6). No deaths, major or minor amputations, clinically driven target lesion revascularizations (cd-TLR), or clinically driven target vessel revascularizations (cd-TVRs) occurred. Visit-based 12-month primary patency was 83.3% (5/6); the single binary restenosis was detected at day 391, resulting in Kaplan-Meier primary patency of 100% at calendar day 365. The mean overall Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) score increased from 21.87 ± 19.16 at baseline to 62.28 ± 38.78 at 12 months. Conclusions: BIOtorcin™ demonstrated rapid systemic appearance following BRight DCB treatment, followed by a progressive decline in circulating parent drug concentrations and low systemic exposure to its metabolite, sirolimus. These pharmacokinetic findings, together with successful device delivery and the absence of major safety concerns over 12 months, demonstrate procedural feasibility and support continued clinical evaluation of the BRight DCB. Given the pharmacokinetic study design and small sample size (n = 6), the 12-month clinical, functional, and patency findings are exploratory and hypothesis-generating and should not be interpreted as evidence of clinical efficacy.

PMID 42940165
阅读全文 →
PubMedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026-10-27

Advanced Paclitaxel Delivery Systems in Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine: Current Formulations and Emerging Technologies.

Crețeanu Andreea A, Lungu Claudiu N CN, Gratiela Popa Eliza E, Tartau Liliana Mititelu LM et al.

Oncology and cardiology use paclitaxel, a powerful cell-division inhibitor. Paclitaxel-eluting coated metal stents in oncology prevent tumor growth by modulating proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. Paclitaxel-eluting stents reduce in-stent restenosis and maintain arterial patency in cardiology. Paclitaxel encapsulated in liposomes improves targeted administration, pharmacokinetics, and therapeutic efficacy. Liposome-loaded paclitaxel has a stronger anti-tumor effect than standard formulations. Paclitaxel plus sirolimus in a stent may synergistically prevent restenosis and inhibit tumors. Liposomal formulations with supplemental medications offer promising prospects for improving therapeutic accuracy and efficacy. Liposomal paclitaxel enhances targeted drug delivery, which may improve cancer treatment and cardiovascular treatments such as drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons in interventional radiology. Advanced delivery technologies have changed paclitaxel drug delivery methods for therapeutic use by overcoming its low solubility and systemic toxicity. Nanocrystals and liposomes enable high drug loading and precise targeted delivery, and, by eliminating toxic solvents such as Cremophor EL, they improve the safety and efficacy of cancer therapy.

PMID 42943723
阅读全文 →
PubMedAdvances in therapy2026-10-26

Sirolimus and Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Patients with Activated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Delta Syndrome (APDS): A Systematic Literature Review.

Hartog Nicholas L NL, Pisarczyk Konrad K, Samad Mike M, Vlachopoulou Katerina K et al.

Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome (APDS) is an ultra-rare disease associated with immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation. Management may include sirolimus and immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT); neither is specifically approved for APDS in the USA. This systematic literature review evaluated the effectiveness and safety of sirolimus and IRT in patients with APDS. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through July 2025, supplemented by grey literature and bibliographic searches. Eligible records reported treatment outcomes in patients with APDS receiving sirolimus and/or IRT. Quality assessment was performed; findings were narratively synthesized. Seventy-nine records (82 publications) were included: 69 case reports of 103 patients, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 2 case series, describing 136 treatment regimens. No prospective studies were identified. Evidence was dominated by case reports (87.3% of records), assessed as low-to-moderate quality. Most records did not include pre- and post-treatment data, comparators, or clearly defined outcomes. Infections were the most commonly reported outcome (44 records), with improvement reported in 59.5% of patients in cohort studies and in 50.0% of regimens in case reports, although improvement was rarely defined. Lymphoproliferation outcomes (35 records) showed no improvement in 35.7-43.8% of patients in cohort studies and in 50.0% of regimens in case reports, although improvement definitions and pre- and post-treatment data were limited. Progression to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation occurred in 12.9% of patients. In all patients receiving sirolimus in cohort studies, renal/hepatic toxicity was reported in 19.2-25.0% of patients and discontinuation from any cause was reported in 25.0-34.6% of patients. Despite numerous records, the effectiveness of sirolimus and IRT cannot be reliably quantified from the published APDS literature, which largely consists of low-to-moderate quality case reports. More methodologically rigorous studies are needed to inform treatment strategies for these therapies in APDS.

PMID 42932134
阅读全文 →
PubMedAsiaIntervention2026-10-25

Biolimus- versus sirolimus-eluting stents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Suruagy-Motta Ricardo F O RFO, Dexheimer da Silva Leonardo L, Rezende Neves Gabriel G, Farias Carlos Alexandre CA et al.

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) are a benchmark in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while biolimus-eluting stents (BES), which combine a more lipophilic analogue with a biodegradable polymer, may enhance healing and reduce thrombosis. Whether these BES features translate into improved survival and cardiac outcomes compared with SES remains uncertain. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating BES compared with SES in adult patients undergoing PCI. This meta-analysis encompassed randomised and controlled clinical trials that directly compared BES with SES in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to June 2025. The main outcomes assessed were all-cause and cardiac mortality, while secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularisation (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST). Outcomes were evaluated at <=1 year (early) and >1-5 years (midterm) using pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed by the I2 test. Six trials (12,109 patients: 6,088 BES, 6,021 SES) were analysed. BES reduced 1-year cardiac death by 30% (RR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52-0.93) and showed a non-significant 19% reduction in all-cause death (RR 0.81; p=0.058). MACE, myocardial infarction, and TLR were similar between stents across timepoints. BES showed a non-significant early increase in ST (RR 1.85; p=0.12) but a 46% reduction in late ST (RR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33-0.88). Mortality rates converged after 1 year. BES offer a short-term reduction in cardiac mortality and late stent thrombosis compared with SES, with otherwise similar morbidity outcomes. These results support the short-term safety of BES and indicate a possible long-term thrombotic and cardiac survival benefit, warranting confirmation in longer-term trials.

PMID 42923777
阅读全文 →
PubMedJournal of the American College of Cardiology2026-10-23

Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease Without Tissue Loss: A Secondary Analysis of the SirPAD Trial.

Tsaftaridis Nikolaos N, Wolf Simon S, Engelberger Rolf P RP, Held Ulrike U et al.

Whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty performs better than uncoated balloon angioplasty among patients with exertional symptoms due to femoropopliteal artery disease remains uncertain. This study sought to describe 1-year outcomes after sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty among participants in the SirPAD (Sirolimus-Coated Balloon for Peripheral Artery Disease) trial with femoropopliteal artery disease. In this analysis of the multicenter, randomized, blinded-endpoint SirPAD trial, we evaluated outcomes for patients with femoropopliteal target lesions and without tissue loss (Rutherford category ≤4, Fontaine stage ≤III). A secondary subgroup was restricted to patients with a lower disease burden, excluding ischemic rest pain, prior major amputation, or below-the-knee revascularization. We compared the 1-year rate of: 1) target-lesion revascularization (TLR); 2) the composite of TLR and any unplanned amputation; 3) major adverse limb events; and 4) all-cause death. Among 597 patients, median age was 71 years, 34.7% were women, and median target-lesion length was 150 mm; 53.8% had total occlusion. After 1 year, 50 patients (17.0%) had undergone TLR in the sirolimus-coated balloon group vs 82 (27.1%) among control subjects (absolute risk difference [ARD]: -10.1%; 95% CI: -16.6 to -3.0). Any amputation or any TLR occurred in 17.7% and 27.1% of patients respectively (ARD: -9.4%; 95% CI: -16.0 to -2.7). Major adverse limb events occurred in 4.1% vs 8.9% of patients, respectively (ARD: -4.8%; 95% CI: -9.0 to -0.8). One-year all-cause death was similar (3.7% vs 5.3%). Among patients with femoropopliteal artery disease and no tissue loss, sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty was associated with a lower 1-year rate of TLR compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty. These findings are descriptive rather than confirmatory. (Sirolimus-Coated Balloon for Peripheral Artery Disease; NCT04238546).

PMID 42909452
阅读全文 →
PubMedFrontiers in pediatrics2026-10-23

Retrospective evaluation of sirolimus (mTOR blocker) for lymphatic malformations presenting in the neonatal period: a single-center experience.

Podkamenev Alexey A, Syrtsova Arina A, Kondratiev Gleb G, Nabokov Victor V et al.

Lymphatic malformations are rare vascular anomalies. Currently, there is no uniform approach to the treatment of these patients. Neonates with extensive disease often suffer from multiple complications, organ dysfunction, and various tissue lesions, which may be life-threatening and lead to aesthetic deformity. Treatment with sirolimus has the potential to improve symptoms and downsize the lesion, up to complete regression. This retrospective single-center study presents our experience with oral sirolimus in the treatment of newborns with lymphatic malformations, evaluating its efficacy and safety. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 23 patients in the neonatal period and early infancy with lymphatic malformations, treated at the St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University between 2021 and 2025. Seven patients underwent primary radical surgical treatment and were not included in the analysis. The final study cohort consisted of 16 patients who received primary conservative therapy with sirolimus. Fifteen out of 16 patients started receiving oral sirolimus before the age of 28 days of life. The median age at the commencement of treatment was 15 days after birth. After instrumental and laboratory examination, sirolimus was administered at a starting reduced dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day divided into two daily doses, followed by a gradual increase under clinical and laboratory monitoring. The therapeutic concentration of sirolimus in the blood (5-15 ng/mL) was monitored once a week. Disease stabilization or regression was achieved in all 16 patients (100%), with a partial or complete radiological response (≥50% volume reduction) in 13 patients (81.25%) and complete regression (>90% volume reduction) in 10 patients (62.5%) at the 6-month assessment. No treatment-related serious adverse events requiring permanent discontinuation were observed. Recorded adverse events included transient respiratory infections (n = 2), diarrhea (n = 2), aphthous stomatitis (n = 1), and mild anemia (n = 1), all of which resolved with supportive care or temporary dose adjustment. In this selected cohort, sirolimus demonstrated an acceptable safety and efficacy profile, supporting its feasibility as a conservative first-line strategy in neonates with extensive or unresectable lymphatic malformations. However, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

PMID 42909030
阅读全文 →

注册免费账户还可查看另外 9996 篇文献

免费注册查看全部文献 →

了解更多sirolimus