Contemporary bulk-fill restorative materials under simulated asthma inhalation therapy: a comparative assessment of surface stability.
Misilli Tuğba T, Yenidünya Özge Gizem ÖG, Çelik Enes E
To compare the surface stability of four contemporary bulk-fill restorative materials following simulated 21-day antiasthmatic inhalation therapy, and to investigate the relationships among the resulting surface changes. One hundred ninety-two disc-shaped specimens (8 × 2 mm) were prepared from four bulk-fill restorative materials: a nanofilled composite (Filtek One Bulk), an alkasite (Cention Forte), a giomer (Beautifil-Bulk) and a self-cure composite (Stela Capsule) (n = 8 per subgroup). Specimens were exposed once daily for 21 days via nebulizer to budesonide, fluticasone, salbutamol, budesonide + salbutamol, or fluticasone + salbutamol, while the control specimens were stored in artificial saliva. Changes in color (ΔE00), gloss, microhardness and surface roughness were assessed relative to baseline. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests and Spearman correlations (α = 0.05). Restorative material and inhaler group significantly affected all four parameters (p < 0.05). Salbutamol caused significantly greater changes than budesonide, fluticasone and the control in every material; the combination regimens were intermediate, and budesonide and fluticasone generally did not differ. The self-cure composite was the least stable and the nanofilled composite the most stable (except for color); microhardness loss increased significantly in the order Filtek One Bulk < Beautifil-Bulk < Cention Forte < Stela Capsule. All four surface parameters were strongly and positively correlated (ρ = 0.79-0.94; p < 0.001). Simulated antiasthmatic inhaler exposure degraded the surface of all bulk-fill materials in a material-dependent manner, with salbutamol exerting the greatest effect. The nanofilled composite showed the highest resistance. For asthmatic patients, and especially frequent salbutamol users, a highly filled light-cured nanofilled composite appears preferable to a self-cure bulk-fill composite where surface durability is clinically important.