Drug Database
BE

bevacizumab (BP 01 / Bevqolva / BP01)

✓ Approved

Aurobindo Pharma Limited · VEGFA · 单克隆抗体

什么是 bevacizumab?

bevacizumab 是一种单克隆抗体,由Aurobindo Pharma Limited研发。该药已获批,用于治疗相关适应症,给药途径:Injectable (Others)、Intravenous (IV)。

药物档案

商品名BP 01, Bevqolva, BP01
公司Aurobindo Pharma Limited
药物类别单克隆抗体, 抗体
分子靶点VEGFA
给药途径Injectable (Others), Intravenous (IV)
状态Approved

作用机制

分子靶点

bevacizumab 作用于 1 个分子靶点:

VEGFAvascular endothelial growth factor A (VPF, MVCD1)
需要更深入的分析?Noah AI 可解释复杂机制并与同类药物比较。

治疗适应症

bevacizumab 针对 9 个适应症,涉及 2 个治疗领域。

治疗领域疾病/病症分期
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Non-small cell lung cancer stage IV✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Non-small cell lung cancer metastatic✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Ovarian cancer✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Renal cancer✓ Approved
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Colorectal cancer✓ Approved

注册免费账户还可查看另外 4 个适应症

免费注册查看全部适应症 →

相关研究文献

PubMedHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026-07-27

Cost-effectiveness of finotonlimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in China.

Xu Huihui H, Yu Shengjian S, Yang Yan Y, Bian Haoze H et al.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) imposes a substantial health burden in China. Finotonlimab plus bevacizumab recently prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib, but its economic value remains unknown. Here we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of finotonlimab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. Parametric survival models were fitted to extrapolate PFS and OS. Total costs, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), and incremental net health benefit (INHB) were estimated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $27,906 per QALY. Uncertainty was evaluated by one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), subgroup analyses, scenario analyses, and price simulations. In the base-case analysis, sorafenib yielded 1.74 LYs and 1.25 QALYs at a total cost of $10,303.10, whereas finotonlimab plus bevacizumab yielded 3.01 LYs and 2.18 QALYs at a total cost of $58,595.49. Compared with sorafenib, the combination increased costs by $48,292.39 and generated gains of 1.27 LYs and 0.93 QALYs, resulting in ICERs of $38,203.46 per LY and $51,899.31 per QALY. INMB (-$22,325.82) and INHB (-0.80 QALYs) were negative. Sensitivity analyses identified PFS utility and bevacizumab cost as key drivers, but all ICERs remained above the WTP threshold. In PSA, the mean ICER was $50561.81 per QALY, and the probability of cost-effectiveness was 0% at the prespecified threshold. Based on the assumptions and inputs used in the present model, finotonlimab plus bevacizumab was unlikely to be cost-effective compared with sorafenib at the prespecified WTP in China.

PMID 42505057
阅读全文 →
PubMedExpert review of vaccines2026-07-27

When precision medicine meets rigid vaccination: bridging the policy gap for patients on biologics.

He Dingxian D, Zhang Yunlu Y, Luo Sushan S, Feng Tianxing T

PMID 42504072
阅读全文 →
PubMedJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026-07-27

Evaluating the feasibility of health care databases for assessing the safety of switching between originator biologics and biosimilars.

Mendelsohn Aaron B AB, DeFor Terese A TA, Audrey Djibo Djeneba D, Myers Scott M SM et al.

Real-world data (RWD) have received considerable attention recently, namely, with regard to their value in providing further evidence about the benefit-risk profile for medicinal products beyond clinical trial data. RWD may be particularly useful for establishing interchangeability and supporting switching decisions between originator biologics and their biosimilars. To evaluate the fitness of 3 US health care databases-a national, commercial health plan, a regional integrated delivery network (IDN), and a multipayer, national claims-based database (henceforth, multipayer database)-for capturing data from clinical trials assessing interchangeability between originator biologics and biosimilars across multiple therapeutic areas. We identified 8 clinical trials examining switching between originator biologics and biosimilars from the published literature and ClinicalTrials.gov. All variables representing inclusion/exclusion criteria, interventions, and outcomes from these trials were recorded and grouped into 8 categories: assessment, behavior, demographic, diagnostic, laboratory, procedure, treatment, and vital signs. The 3 databases were then individually evaluated based on the availability of variables identified from the clinical trials and by calculating the percentage of observed data in each database for all relevant variables across the clinical trials, overall and within the above categories. The population size varied across the databases (4 million for the regional IDN through 170 million patient-lives in the multipayer database). All databases had complete (100%) capture for procedure, treatment, and vital signs data and performed well for capturing diagnostic information (78%-100%). Most demographic information (eg, age, sex) was captured; however, race and ethnicity was not available for all databases. Seventy-one percent of the behavior data (eg, whether the patient was sexually active) was captured by the commercial health plan and the regional IDN, but only 29% by the multipayer database. Assessment data (eg, survival, functional status) varied across the databases, with the regional IDN having 93% data capture vs 37% and 16% in the commercial health plan and multipayer database, respectively. Notable differences among the databases were also observed for laboratory data; the regional IDN had complete capture vs only 6% in the multipayer database. Health care databases provide information such as diagnoses, treatments, and some outcomes that may be useful for generating real-world evidence relevant to biosimilar regulatory assessment. However, details on treatment effectiveness may be limited. Specific databases should be evaluated according to their unique attributes to select the most appropriate source(s) of information for a given research need. Further studies are warranted to evaluate data accuracy and timeliness in health care databases.

PMID 42504812
阅读全文 →
PubMedThe Journal of dermatology2026-07-27

Treatment Patterns and Pathways of Systemic Drug Therapy in Patients With Plaque, Erythrodermic, and Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan.

Tada Yayoi Y, Maeda Yoshiko Y, Hasegawa Miyuki M, Sakaguchi Motonobu M et al.

Systemic psoriasis treatment options have rapidly expanded in Japan, including the approval of tyrosine kinase 2 and interleukin-36 receptor inhibitors in 2022. However, contemporary real-world treatment patterns across plaque, erythrodermic, and generalized pustular psoriasis remain incompletely characterized. Using a Japanese hospital-based insurance claims database (Medical Data Vision Co. Ltd.), we conducted a retrospective cohort study for patients with these psoriasis subtypes who initiated systemic drug therapy between 2020-2023 and had a ≥ 12-month observation period. Overall, 3965 patients with plaque psoriasis, 80 with erythrodermic psoriasis, and 128 with generalized pustular psoriasis were included (median age, 62-66 years). Most patients initiated systemic therapy with a single drug. A phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor was the most frequently prescribed index treatment for plaque psoriasis (48.8%), whereas a vitamin A derivative was most commonly prescribed for erythrodermic and generalized pustular psoriasis (42.5% and 42.2%, respectively), suggesting a distinctive Japan-specific prescription pattern. The median proportion of days covered for index treatment was nearly 100% across all subtypes. Among the index treatments, biologics generally showed longer time to discontinuation than oral medications. Elderly patients were more likely to receive a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor or a vitamin A derivative as index treatment than younger patients, and biologics were more commonly selected for patients with psoriatic arthritis than for those without. Early uptake of tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor was observed in 2023. Over a median observation period of approximately 30 months, > 85% of patients received three or fewer lines of systemic drug therapy and approximately 50% remained on at least one systemic drug therapy throughout the study period. This first comprehensive Japanese claims database analysis of multiple psoriasis subtypes provides an updated real-world treatment landscape in Japan and helps address an important evidence gap arising from rapidly evolving systemic treatment options and limited contemporary real-world data.

PMID 42504061
阅读全文 →
PubMedClinics in dermatology2026-07-27

VEXAS Syndrome: An Emerging Autoinflammatory Paraneoplastic Disorder.

Chen Ryan R, Fettel Kevin K, Sakunchotpanit Goranit G, Tran Richard R et al.

VEXAS syndrome (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) is a novel autoinflammatory disorder caused by somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. It predominantly affects older males, though cases in females with X-chromosome mosaicism have been reported in the literature. Dermatologic manifestations, found in up to 90% of cases, are significant diagnostic clues and may include erythematous plaques, Sweet syndrome-like lesions, and livedo reticularis. VEXAS syndrome poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its overlap with hematologic, autoimmune, and inflammatory disease. Hallmark findings include macrocytic anemia, myeloid vacuolization, and the presence of UBA1 mutations. Current treatment options include corticosteroids, biologics, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but data on long-term efficacy is limited. Advances in understanding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of VEXAS syndrome will be essential in improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

PMID 42503337
阅读全文 →
PubMedThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2026-07-27

Beyond Biologics: Background Inhaled Therapy Shapes Remission in Severe Asthma.

Quaranta Vitaliano Nicola VN, Amoroso Giulia G, Marinelli Alessio A, Dragonieri Silvano S et al.

Clinical remission has emerged as an achievable therapeutic goal in severe asthma treated with biologics. However, the potential influence of background inhaled therapy on remission outcomes remains insufficiently explored. This study evaluated whether baseline inhaled therapy, particularly extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT), influences the achievement of complete clinical remission in patients with severe asthma initiating biologic treatment. We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study including adult patients with severe asthma who initiated biological therapy according to Italian regulatory criteria (AIFA). Baseline (T0) corresponded to the start of biologic therapy without modification of inhaled treatment. Inhaled therapy was maintained unchanged during the 12-month follow-up. All patients underwent a clinical reassessment at 3 months to evaluate asthma control, adherence, and exacerbation occurrence. Complete remission at 12 months was defined according to Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI) criteria: absence of exacerbations, well-controlled symptoms (ACT ≥20), no oral corticosteroid use, stable lung function, and no change in inhaled therapy. Clinical, functional, and inflammatory variables were compared between patients achieving complete remission and those who did not. Twenty-nine patients were included (median age 53 years, IQR 41-59; 55.2% male). At baseline, inhaled therapy consisted of high-dose ICS/LABA in 37.9%, open triple therapy in 27.6%, and extrafine SITT in 34.5% of patients. At the 3-month reassessment, no patient experienced exacerbations or worsening of asthma control, and inhaled therapy was not modified. After 12 months of biologic therapy, 14 patients (48.3%) achieved complete clinical remission. Remission rates differed significantly according to inhaled therapy regimen (p = 0.001). The highest remission proportion was observed in patients receiving extrafine SITT (64.3%), followed by open triple therapy (21.4%) and high-dose ICS/LABA (14.3%). Patients achieving remission were significantly more likely to be receiving extrafine SITT at baseline (64.3% vs 6.7%), whereas high-dose ICS/LABA predominated among non-remission patients (60.0% vs 14.3%). No significant differences were observed between groups in demographic characteristics, asthma duration, lung function, inflammatory biomarkers (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE), comorbidities, or type of biologic therapy. In patients with severe asthma initiating biologic therapy, baseline inhaled therapy-particularly extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy- was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving complete clinical remission. The higher remission rate observed with extrafine SITT compared with open triple therapy or ICS/LABA is consistent with a potential synergistic interaction between optimized inhaled therapy targeting small airway dysfunction and biologic therapy targeting type-2 inflammation. These findings support the importance of maintaining optimized background inhaled therapy within a remission-driven treatment strategy. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these observations.

PMID 42504775
阅读全文 →

注册免费账户还可查看另外 9996 篇文献

免费注册查看全部文献 →

了解更多bevacizumab