Drug Database
MI

midazolam

✓ Approved

Rafa Laboratories Ltd · GABRA1 · 小分子

什么是 midazolam?

midazolam 是一种小分子,由Rafa Laboratories Ltd研发。该药已获批,用于治疗相关适应症,给药途径:Injectable (Others)、Intramuscular (IM) Injection。

药物档案

公司Rafa Laboratories Ltd
药物类别小分子
分子靶点GABRA1, GABRA2, GABRA3, GABRA4, GABRA5
给药途径Injectable (Others), Intramuscular (IM) Injection
状态Approved

作用机制

分子靶点

midazolam 作用于 5 个分子靶点:

GABRA1gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor alpha1 subunit (DEE19, ECA4)
GABRA2gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor alpha2 subunit (DEE78, EIEE78)
GABRA3gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor alpha3 subunit (EPILX2)
GABRA4gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor alpha4 subunit ()
GABRA5gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor alpha5 subunit (EIEE79, DEE79)
需要更深入的分析?Noah AI 可解释复杂机制并与同类药物比较。

治疗适应症

midazolam 针对 1 个适应症,涉及 1 个治疗领域。

治疗领域疾病/病症分期
Nervous system disordersStatus epilepticus✓ Approved

相关研究文献

PubMedClinical and translational science2026-09-10

Evaluation of the Effect of Cendakimab on the Pharmacokinetics of CYP Probe Drugs in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Zhang Peijin P, Charriez Christina M CM, Murthy Bindu B, Basdeo Shenita S et al.

Cendakimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-13 binding to its receptors. Although not expected to share clearance pathways with small molecules, its use in eosinophilic esophagitis, a type 2 inflammatory disease, may indirectly affect cytochrome P450 activity by modulating cytokine signaling affecting certain cytochrome P450 enzymes. This open-label, single-sequence study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of cytochrome P450 substrates in adults with active eosinophilic esophagitis, evidenced by a peak eosinophil count of ≥ 15 per high-power field in esophageal biopsies and clinical symptoms of esophageal dysfunction, before and after 16 weeks of cendakimab treatment. Patients received a cocktail of probe substrates (caffeine 200 mg, warfarin 10 mg + vitamin K 10 mg, omeprazole 40 mg, dextromethorphan 30 mg, midazolam 5 mg) for cytochrome P450 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A in two sequential periods, separated by 16 weeks of cendakimab treatment. Blood samples were analyzed to assess pharmacokinetics. Sixteen patients were treated; 15 completed the study. Exposures (AUC and Cmax) of caffeine, S-warfarin, midazolam, and omeprazole were comparable before and after treatment. Dextromethorphan exposure showed no clinically meaningful change, although interpretation is limited by small sample size. Cendakimab was well tolerated. All adverse events were mild to moderate, with no serious adverse events, deaths or discontinuations from adverse events. No clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiograms were observed. Cendakimab had no clinically meaningful effects on cytochrome P450 enzyme activities and was generally safe and well tolerated with or without probe substrates in adults with active eosinophilic esophagitis.

PMID 42720178
阅读全文 →
PubMedThe AAPS journal2026-09-10

Verification of a Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic Model for Predicting CYP3A4-mediated Simvastatin and Simvastatin Acid Drug-drug Interactions.

Morse Bridget L BL, Han Bing B, Alberts Jeffrey J JJ, Posada Maria M MM et al.

Simvastatin is a commonly prescribed medication and a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate requiring dosage modification with CYP3A4 precipitants. Unlike other CYP3A4 substrates, grapefruit juice (GFJ) causes the largest increase in simvastatin exposure of any CYP3A4 inhibitor, leading to misunderstanding of simvastatin fraction escaping CYP3A4 metabolism in the gut (Fg, CYP3A4) and fraction metabolized by CYP3A4 in the liver (fm,CYP3A4). Simvastatin is a prodrug that is converted to the active simvastatin acid, though the mechanisms responsible for in vivo simvastatin acid formation are not well-understood. GFJ also decreases the simvastatin acid:simvastatin exposure ratio, suggesting inhibition of simvastatin acid formation. In the current work, we used a static approach to define simvastatin CYP3A4 parameters, using clinical data with index substrate midazolam; estimated simvastatin Fg,CYP3A4 and fm,CYP3A4 were ~ 0.4 and ~ 0.9, respectively. In vitro data assessing the stability of simvastatin and simvastatin acid demonstrated rapid conversion in gastric fluid that was highly pH-dependent. A simvastatin PBPK model was constructed incorporating these CYP3A4 parameters and simvastatin acid formation in stomach, intestine and plasma. The model reproduced the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and CYP3A4 precipitant effects, thus qualifying the model for prediction of CYP3A4-mediated interactions on both simvastatin and simvastatin acid. Simvastatin overall Fg was estimated as ~ 0.2, lower than the Fg,CYP3A4 due to additional intestinal esterase-mediated formation of simvastatin acid. The simvastatin-GFJ effect was explained by inhibition of this intestinal simvastatin acid formation, along with CYP3A4 inhibition. The unique effect of food on the simvastatin acid:simvastatin exposure ratio could also be replicated using this PBPK model.

PMID 42717157
阅读全文 →
PubMedEpilepsia2026-09-09

Intranasal midazolam vs mouth-dissolving clobazam in terminating seizures: A randomized controlled trial.

Fatima Saman S, Elavarasi Arunmozhimaran A, Ramanujam Bhargavi B, Singh Rajesh Kumar RK et al.

Acute seizure crises, such as prolonged seizures and impending status epilepticus, need prompt out-of-hospital treatment with benzodiazepines. However, efficacious and easily administered rescue medications are grossly underutilized and form an unmet need in management paradigms. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy of mouth-dissolving clobazam with intranasal midazolam in terminating seizures in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU). A single-center, prospective, randomized, open blinded end point (PROBE) trial was conducted over a period of 1.5 years. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) having clobazam as one of the polytherapy agents were enrolled prospectively into the study. They were randomized to receive either intranasal midazolam or mouth-dissolving clobazam if they had prolonged seizures lasting more than 2 min. Time to clinical and electrographic termination of seizures was the primary outcome. Adverse effects or injury, treatment failure, seizure recurrence, and treatment satisfaction were secondary outcomes. Ninety-five patients were enrolled in the study: 47 in the intranasal midazolam group, and 48 in mouth dissolving clobazam group. The Cox proportional hazards model suggested hazard ratio [HR]: .39 (.15-1.02) (p = .05), for clinical termination of seizures, and HR: .56 (.23-1.37) (p = .22), for electrographic termination of seizures. The log-rank test suggested no statistically significant difference between two curves with respect to time of termination of clinical (p = .17) and electrographic (p = .39) seizures. There were no significant adverse effects, and treatment failure or seizure recurrence was noted in either arm. Treatment satisfaction did not significantly differ between the two arms. There was no statistically significant difference between intranasal midazolam and mouth-dissolving clobazam for termination of clinical and electrographic seizures. We propose that mouth-dissolving clobazam merits further research as a reasonably efficacious, convenient, and cost-effective alternative to intranasal midazolam for acute termination of pre-hospital seizures.

PMID 42714882
阅读全文 →
PubMedJournal of equine veterinary science2026-09-09

Anesthetic Recovery Following a Midazolam-Containing Co-Induction Protocol in Horses Undergoing Total Intravenous Anesthesia.

Claudino J A JA, Avelar P H S PHS, Rosa M C B MCB, Ferrante M M et al.

Anesthetic recovery is a critical phase in horses under field conditions, and induction protocols may influence recovery quality during total intravenous anesthesia. To compare two anesthetic induction protocols, one including midazolam and the other based solely on xylazine and ketamine, regarding anesthetic induction and recovery quality, total recovery time, and attempts to achieve standing in horses undergoing total intravenous anesthesia. Twelve healthy male horses older than 2 years were randomly assigned to XC (xylazine 1 mg/kg and ketamine 2 mg/kg) or XCM (xylazine 0.5 mg/kg, ketamine 2 mg/kg, and midazolam 0.1 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained with continuous guaifenesin, ketamine, and xylazine infusion. Induction and recovery quality, total recovery time, and attempts to achieve standing were evaluated. Induction quality scores were 3.5 (1-4) for XC and 3.5 (2-5) for XCM (P = 0.61). Total recovery time was 80.3 ± 15.5 and 80.2 ± 20.5 min, respectively (P = 0.98). Recovery quality was poorer with XCM on the descriptive scale [2.5 (2-4) vs. 1 (1-1); P = 0.003] and quantitative scale (40.3 ± 11.5 vs. 19.0 ± 3.2; P = 0.002). Attempts to achieve standing were 2 (1-4) with XCM and 1 (1-1) with XC (P = 0.03). Under the conditions studied, XCM was associated with poorer recovery quality and more attempts to achieve standing than XC.

PMID 42716191
阅读全文 →
PubMedAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026-09-09

High-sensitive determination of midazolam in urine samples using hydrogen peroxide-free enhanced electrochemiluminescence sensor based on modified polypyrrole/carbon paste electrode.

Ahmadi Farzane F, Alizadeh Naader N

This paper proposes an enhanced electrochemiluminescence (ECL) nanostructure sensor for midazolam (Mdz) determination via one-step electropolymerization of the conductive molecularly imprinted polymer (CMIP) based on polypyrrole (PPy) on a carbon paste electrode (CPE) by the cyclic voltammetric (CV) technique. The FESEM technique showed that the surface of the sensor is made of nano-sized particles. In the absence of hydrogen peroxide, ECL signals of luminol were investigated and an enhanced response was observed by adding Mdz to the solution. Optimal experimental conditions were obtained for the proposed sensor. Its ECL behavior was investigated and the reaction mechanism was discussed. The calibration curve of the CMIP sensor was obtained in the dynamic linear range from 10 to 400 nM with a limit of detection (LOD) of 6 nM for the Mdz determination in solution. The good selectivity of the proposed CMIP sensor was shown by investigating the effect of some interferences on the CMIP and non-imprinted polymer electrode. This sensor was able to determine the amount of Mdz in urine samples with acceptable sensitivity.

PMID 42711557
阅读全文 →
PubMedRadiology2026-09-08

Ketamine Plus Midazolam versus Fentanyl Plus Midazolam for Sedation and Analgesia during Image-guided Procedures in Interventional Radiology: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Deipolyi Amy R AR, Bommineni Maanasa M, Ahmad Ashraf A, Belcher Adam A et al.

Background Opioid-benzodiazepine regimens remain common for radiologist-administered procedural sedation despite respiratory and analgesic effectiveness concerns. Purpose To compare intraprocedural pain and patient-reported experience between ketamine/midazolam and fentanyl/midazolam during image-guided procedural sedation. Materials and Methods This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single academic center between June 2025 and February 2026. Adults undergoing image-guided lung or bone biopsy or abscess drainage were randomized to fentanyl/midazolam or ketamine/midazolam administered by interventional radiologists. Procedures were performed using US, CT, CT fluoroscopy, or combined CT and US guidance. The primary outcome was maximum intraprocedural pain (0-10 on the Numeric Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes included sedation depth, physiologic parameters, oxygen desaturation, patient-reported experience assessed using a modified Heidelberg questionnaire, and complications. Results Among 264 randomized procedures (132 procedures per group) in 260 participants (median age, 68 years [IQR, 61-75 years]; 135 [52%] female), ketamine/midazolam resulted in lower maximum intraprocedural pain than fentanyl/midazolam (mean difference, -1.4 points [95% CI: -2.0, -0.8]; P < .001). Pain scores greater than 4 occurred less frequently with ketamine/midazolam (2.3% vs 17%; absolute difference, 14 percentage points [95% CI: 8, 21]; P < .001). Ketamine/midazolam was associated with higher nadir oxygen saturation (mean difference, +1.4% [95% CI: 0.6, 2.2]; P = .001) and fewer oxygen desaturation events below 90% (three [2.3%] vs 13 [9.8%]; absolute difference, 7.6 percentage points [95% CI: 1.9, 13.3]; P = .02). Ketamine/midazolam produced deeper sedation and higher intraprocedural systolic blood pressure. Hallucinations occurred more frequently with ketamine/midazolam (15 [11.4%] vs five [3.8%]; absolute difference, 7.6 percentage points [95% CI: 1.3, 13.9]; P = .03), though overall procedural comfort, reduced recall, and perceived adequacy of sedation were improved. Procedure-related and sedation-related complications did not differ between groups. Conclusion Radiologist-administered ketamine/midazolam during image-guided procedural sedation improved analgesia and patient-reported experience with fewer hypoxemic events and no increase in complications compared with fentanyl/midazolam. Clinical trial registration no. NCT07040163 © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Weiss and Park in this issue.

PMID 42708854
阅读全文 →

注册免费账户还可查看另外 9996 篇文献

免费注册查看全部文献 →

了解更多midazolam